Jiucheng Palace Liquan Ming

[Jiucheng Palace Liquan Ming]

33.2 × 36.4 cm
Clear rubbings. The word “Fu” of “Although you can’t rest” has not been gouged out into the word “Don’t”, and the word “Bao” of “Always keep your virginity and good fortune” has not been gouged out next to the word “You”
The bibliography of steles in Ouzhai Collection:
The inscription of Li Quan in Jiucheng Palace
Also in the Ming Dynasty, Tuolinyou has not been chiseled. Old collection of Songlin Hall. Wang Hongjia recorded the postscript of Wang Yanzhou. You have come to the end of your journey. Thirty-two. One volume
The Epigraph and Postscript of Ouzhai Graphite records that:
In the Ming Dynasty, Tuolinyou did not chisel the original, and Songlin Hall was the old collection. Wang Hongjia recorded the postscript of Wang Yanzhou. Guiyou wrote and signed it. One volume
In this world, the so-called Linyou has not been carved, which is rare today. Yang Dabiao’s “Tie Han Zhai Shu Bu” is based on the Li Quan engraving, which is based on the end of Lin You’s hall, but the original engraving is not the same. This is a conjecture. Linyou is the site of the Jiucheng Palace of the Tang Dynasty. The original stone still exists today, but it is thin and barren. The so-called uncut stone refers to the original stone that has been damaged and not repaired by the civilian officials in the Ming Dynasty. The rubbings in the early Northern Song Dynasty in my collection are thick and thick, and the boundary still exists. They are really uncut, and this is the only one I have seen for decades. In addition, there are fat ones, thin ones, fat ones close to clumsy ones, thin ones close to beautiful ones, all of which have been treated repeatedly, and the range is not true. In the past, it was difficult to distinguish the orchid pavilion. Why is it different when it is 90%? The origin of the saying that the original carving of Yang Dapai is not the same. It is also said that the original of the debate is a copy, which is not exhaustive. Covering the south crossing of Tianshui, this tablet is separated by foreign lands. Anyone who sells goods from the north to the south is called the book of the market. There is no doubt that there is a copy of it, but there is also no original stone. Although this glyph is thin, it still looks like it was in the same year. Since the Song and Yuan Dynasties, the traces of grinding and curing have been flat again, so the truth is gradually revealed. For example, the beauty is late in life, the gloss is removed, and the beautiful bone is naturally formed, and can not be covered. Wang Hongjia recorded the Yanzhou postscript, and the small script was very elegant. Hongjia character jade, Shanshi Kundi travel. I can see that the Huayin Huashan Stele has its supplementary book, Zhao Zi’s letter postscript, which is exquisite and beautiful. Together with it, the following title is “Three days after the Mid-Autumn Festival of 1911, I am forty-seven years old, and I used it in Lu Mo”. Five years ago, the postscript was fifty-two years old, and the rest of this year was fifty-two years old. What a coincidence! There is also a long-standing cause for the results. On the day before the Qixi of the Guiyou Autumn Festival, Yi Xuan wrote in Qianlong’s imperial ink


九成宫醴泉铭(册页1)九成宫醴泉铭(册页2)九成宫醴泉铭(册页3)九成宫醴泉铭(册页4)九成宫醴泉铭(册页5)九成宫醴泉铭(册页6)九成宫醴泉铭(册页7)九成宫醴泉铭(册页8)九成宫醴泉铭(册页9)九成宫醴泉铭(册页10)九成宫醴泉铭(册页11)九成宫醴泉铭(册页12)九成宫醴泉铭(册页13)九成宫醴泉铭(册页14)九成宫醴泉铭(册页15)九成宫醴泉铭(册页16)九成宫醴泉铭(册页17)九成宫醴泉铭(册页18)九成宫醴泉铭(册页19)九成宫醴泉铭(册页20)九成宫醴泉铭(册页21)九成宫醴泉铭(册页22)九成宫醴泉铭(册页23)