Period:Shang dynasty Production date:1300BC-1100BC (circa)
Materials:jade
Technique:
Dimensions:Length: 28.60 centimetres
Description:
Sceptre. Jade scepter imitating a bronze halberd, ge, with grooved and perforated hilt.
IMG
![图片[1]-sceptre; ge BM-1947-0712.446-China Archive](https://chinaarchive.net/Shang dynasty/Jades/mid_00298431_001.jpg)
![图片[2]-sceptre; ge BM-1947-0712.446-China Archive](https://chinaarchive.net/Shang dynasty/Jades/mid_00165952_001.jpg)
![图片[3]-sceptre; ge BM-1947-0712.446-China Archive](https://chinaarchive.net/Shang dynasty/Jades/mid_00506999_001.jpg)
Comments:Rawson 1992:From 4500 BC, jade was employed for exceptionally elegant versions of utilitarian stone tools. Made in jade, the tools were not for daily use but for displays of status and power. Jades, as well as some bronzes, were thus used for special ritual or ceremonial versions of standard everyday items. The material itself was scarcer and required more labour to work it than ordinary stone. Not only the material, but also the ways in which they were worked demonstrated their exalted functions. Jade sceptres were ground more thinly than the stone tools they copied. Had they been used (i.e. to chop down a tree), they would have fractured. Details of shape and design – in other words, aesthetic qualities – were chosen to show off the distinctions between the jade sceptre and the stone axe or, in this case, the bronze blade. Fuirthermore, there would be no point in using these scarce and labour-intensive materials in place of common ones if they could not be inmediately recognised as outstanding. Craftmanship was, therefore, directed to exploiting and displaying the particular qualities of jade that make it recognisably different from ordinary stones. These qualities had to be made visually noticeable. Visual distinctions deployed to separate the ceremonial from the everyday can also be used to refer to smaller differences in the ranking of ritual items. In any society, from ancient China to twentieth-century Europe, the scarcest and most beautiful materials will be restricted to the uses deemed most important by that society.These features also serve to advertise the wealth of the patron who can command supplies of both material and skilled labour. It is therefore not suprising that at times when rulers and their courts wished to assert their authority, they commissioned large numbers of jades. Further, when they wished to distract attention from weakness in society, they emphasized their power even more by increasing expenditure on ritual objects.
Materials:jade
Technique:
Dimensions:Length: 28.60 centimetres
Description:
Sceptre. Jade scepter imitating a bronze halberd, ge, with grooved and perforated hilt.
IMG
Comments:Rawson 1992:From 4500 BC, jade was employed for exceptionally elegant versions of utilitarian stone tools. Made in jade, the tools were not for daily use but for displays of status and power. Jades, as well as some bronzes, were thus used for special ritual or ceremonial versions of standard everyday items. The material itself was scarcer and required more labour to work it than ordinary stone. Not only the material, but also the ways in which they were worked demonstrated their exalted functions. Jade sceptres were ground more thinly than the stone tools they copied. Had they been used (i.e. to chop down a tree), they would have fractured. Details of shape and design – in other words, aesthetic qualities – were chosen to show off the distinctions between the jade sceptre and the stone axe or, in this case, the bronze blade. Fuirthermore, there would be no point in using these scarce and labour-intensive materials in place of common ones if they could not be inmediately recognised as outstanding. Craftmanship was, therefore, directed to exploiting and displaying the particular qualities of jade that make it recognisably different from ordinary stones. These qualities had to be made visually noticeable. Visual distinctions deployed to separate the ceremonial from the everyday can also be used to refer to smaller differences in the ranking of ritual items. In any society, from ancient China to twentieth-century Europe, the scarcest and most beautiful materials will be restricted to the uses deemed most important by that society.These features also serve to advertise the wealth of the patron who can command supplies of both material and skilled labour. It is therefore not suprising that at times when rulers and their courts wished to assert their authority, they commissioned large numbers of jades. Further, when they wished to distract attention from weakness in society, they emphasized their power even more by increasing expenditure on ritual objects.
© Copyright
The copyright of the article belongs to the author, please keep the original link for reprinting.
THE END
